Yet at the same time men are not in the least aware of what really created in them such a sense of insolubility and despair. Whence comes this feeling that it is better not to think about many things?
In reality we feel this despair only when we begin to regard man as something "finite", finished; when we see nothing beyond man, and think that we already know everything about him. In such form the problem is truly a desperate one. A cold wind blows on us from all those social theories promising incalculable welfare on Earth, leaving a sense of dissatisfaction and chill even when we believe their promises.
Why? What is all this for? Well, everybody will be well fed and well taken care of Splendid! But after that, what?
Let us suppose although it is difficult, almost impossible, to imagine that materialistic culture has of itself led men to a fortunate state of existence; that on Earth, there exists an unadulterated civilisation and culture. But after that, what?
After that, nothing but resounding phrases of "incredible horizons" opening before science: "Communication with the planet Mars", "Chemical synthesis of protoplasm", "Utilisation of the rotation of the Earth around the Sun", "Energy imprisoned in an atom", "Vaccine for all diseases", "Life to the length of a hundred years or even to one hundred and fifty!"; and after that, perhaps, "The artificial creation of men" but beyond this, imagination fails.
It may be possible to dig through the Earth, but that would be entirely useless.
Here indeed we encounter a feeling of the insolubility of the main questions concerning the aims of existence, and that feeling of despair on account of our lack of understanding.
Truly, suppose that we have dug completely through the Earth what then? Shall we dig in another direction? But it is all very wearisome. Nevertheless the various positivistic social theories, "historical materialism", and so forth, promise nothing better, and can promise nothing. To get any answer at all to such tormenting questions, we must turn in quite another direction: to the psychological method of study of man and of humanity. And here we see with amazement that the psychological method gives an entirely satisfactory answer to those fundamental questions which seem to us quite insoluble, and around which we fruitlessly wander equipped with the defective instrument of the positivistic method.
The analogy is not quite complete, for the reason that probably only a small part of humanity is capable of growth; but nevertheless this comparison paints a true picture of our usual attitude toward this question. And the fate of that greater part of humanity which will prove incapable of growth depends not upon itself, but upon that minority which will progress. Only inner growth, the unfoldment of new forces, will give to man a correct understanding of himself, his ways, his future, and give him power to organise life on Earth.
At the present time the general concept "man" is too undifferentiated and includes entirely different categories those capable of development and those incapable. In men capable of development, new faculties are stirring into life, though not as yet manifest, because for their manifestation they require a special culture, a special education. The new conception of humanity disposes of the idea of equality which, after all, does not exist. It tries to establish the signs and facts of the differences between men, because humanity will soon need to divide the "progressing" from the "incapable of progress" the wheat from the tares, for the tares are growing too fast, and choke the growth of the wheat.
This is the key to the understanding of our life, and this key was found long ago!
The enigma was solved long ago. But different thinkers, living in different epochs, finding the solution, expressed it differently; and often, not knowing one another, trod the same path amid enormous difficulties, unaware of their predecessors and contemporaries who had gone and were going along the selfsame path.
In the world's literature there exist books, usually little known, which accidentally or by design may happen to be assembled on one shelf in one library. These, taken together, will yield so clear and complete a picture of human existence, its path and its goal, that there will be no further doubts about the destiny of humanity (though only its minor part), but a destiny of quite a different sort from those hard labours of digging through the globe which positive philosophy, "historical materialism", and "socialism" have in store for humankind.
If it seems to us that we do not as yet know our destiny, if we still doubt and do not dare to part with the hopeless "positivistic" view of life, it is primarily because men of different categories, having quite different futures, are commingled into one in our perception. Secondarily, it is because the necessary ideas whereby we might understand the true relation of forces have not won for themselves their rightful place in official science: they do not represent any recognised division or branch of science, and it is rarely possible to find them all in one book. It is even rarely possible to find books expressing these ideas assembled together. [This site is an attempt to alleviate this unfortunate situation. Ed.]
We do not understand many things because we too easily and too arbitrarily specialise. Philosophy, religion, psychology, mathematics, the natural sciences, sociology, the history of culture, art each has its own separate literature. There is no complete whole at all. Even the little bridges between these separate literatures are built very badly and unsuccessfully, while they are often altogether absent. This formation of special literatures is the chief evil and the chief obstacle to a correct understanding of things. Each "literature" elaborates its own terminology, its own language, which is incomprehensible to the students of other literatures, and does not coincide with other languages; by this it defines its own limits the more sharply, divides itself from others, and makes these limits impassable.
But there are movements of thought which strive, not in words but in action, to fight this specialisation.
Books are appearing which it is impossible to refer to any accepted library classification, which it is impossible to "enrol" in any faculty. These books are the forerunners of a new literature which will break down all fences built in the region of thought, and will clearly show to those who desire to know both where they are going and where they can go.
The names of the authors of these books yield the most unexpected combinations. I shall not now mention the names of these authors or the titles of these books, but shall dwell only upon the writings of Edward Carpenter and Dr R M Bucke.
Carpenter travelled in the Orient, visited India and Ceylon, and there he found men, yogi and ascetics, striving to achieve cosmic consciousness, and he holds the opinion that the path to cosmic consciousness is already found in the Orient.
In the book From Adam's Peak to Elephanta, he says:
The West seeks the individual consciousness the enriched mind, ready perceptions and memories, individual hopes and fears, ambitions, loves, conquests the self, the local self, in all its phases and forms and sorely doubts whether such a thing as an universal consciousness exists. The East seeks the universal consciousness, and in these cases where its quest succeeds, individual self and life thin away to a mere film and are only the shadows cast by the glory revealed beyond.
The individual consciousness takes the form of Thought, which is fluid and mobile like quicksilver, perpetually in a state of change and unrest, fraught with pain and effort; the other consciousness is not in the form of thought. It touches, sees, hears, and is those things which it perceives, without motion, without change, without effort, without distinction of subject and object, but with a vast and incredible joy.
The individual consciousness is specially related to the body. The organs of the body are in some degree its organs. But the whole body is only as one organ of the cosmic consciousness. To attain this latter one must have the power of knowing one's self separate from the body of passing into a state of ecstasy, in fact. Without this the cosmic consciousness cannot be experienced.
All the subsequent writings of Carpenter, and especially his book of free verse, Towards Democracy, deal with the psychology of ecstatic experiences and portray the path whereby man goes toward this principal aim of his existence, i.e., to a new consciousness.
Only the attainment of this principal aim will illumine for man the past and the future; it will be a seership, an awakening. Without this, with only the ordinary sleepy "individual" consciousness, man is blind, and cannot hope to know anything that he cannot feel with his stick.
I shall give, in abbreviated form, several quotations from his book.
What is cosmic consciousness?
Cosmic Consciousness is a higher form of consciousness than that possessed by the ordinary man. This last is called Self Consciousness and is that faculty upon which rests all of our life (both subjective and objective) which is not common to us and the higher animals, except that small part of it which is derived from the few individuals who have had the higher consciousness above named. To make the matter clear it must be understood that there are three forms or grades of consciousness:
By means of simple consciousness a dog or a horse is just as conscious of the things about him as a man is; he is also conscious of his own limbs and body and knows that these are a part of himself. By virtue of self-consciousness man is not only conscious of trees, rocks, water, his own limbs and body, but he becomes conscious of himself as a distinct entity apart from all the rest of the universe.
It is as good as certain that no animal can realise himself in that way. Further, by means of self-consciousness, man becomes capable of treating his own mental states as objects of consciousness. The animal is, as it were, immersed in his consciousness as a fish in the sea; he cannot, even in imagination, get outside of it for one moment so as to realise it. But man by virtue of self-consciousness can step aside, as it were, from himself and think: "Yes, that thought that I had about that matter is true". There is no evidence that any animal can think, but if they could we should soon know it. Between two creatures living together, as dogs or horses and men, and each self-conscious, it would be the simplest matter in the world to open up communication. We do, by watching the dog's acts, enter into his mind pretty freely. If he were self-conscious, we must have learned it long ago. We have not learned it and it is as good as certain that no dog, horse, elephant or ape ever was self-conscious.
Another thing: on man's self-consciousness is built everything in and about us distinctly human. Language is the objective of which self-consciousness is the subjective. Self-consciousness and language (two in one for they are two halves of the same thing) are the sine qua non of human social life, of manners, of institutions, of industries of all kinds, of all arts useful and fine. If any animal possessed self-consciousness it would build a superstructure of language.... But no animal has done this; therefore, we infer that no animal has self-consciousness. The possession of self-consciousness and language (its other self) by man creates an enormous gap between him and the highest creature possessing simple consciousness only.
Cosmic Consciousness is a third form which is as far above Self Consciousness as that is above Simple Consciousness. The prime characteristic of cosmic consciousness is, as its name implies, a consciousness of the cosmos, that is, of the life and order of the Universe.
Along with the consciousness of the cosmos there occurs an intellectual enlightenment or illumination which alone would place the individual on a new plane of existence would make him almost a member of a new species. To this is added a state of moral exaltation, an indescribable feeling of elevation, elation, joyousness, and a quickening of the moral sense, which is fully as striking and more important both to the individual and to the race than is the enhanced intellectual power. With these come what may be called a sense of immortality, a consciousness of eternal life not a conviction that he shall have this, but the consciousness that he has it already.
Only a personal experience of it, or a prolonged study of men who have passed into the new life, will enable us to realise what this actually is. The writer expects his work to be useful in two ways: first, in broadening the general view of human life by comprehending in our mental vision this important phase of it; then by enabling us to realise, in some measure, the true status of certain men who, down to the present, are either exalted by the average self-conscious individual to the rank of gods or, going to the other extreme, are adjudged insane.
The writer takes the view that our descendants will sooner or later reach, as a race, the condition of cosmic consciousness just as, long ago, our ancestors passed from simple to self consciousness. He believes that this step in evolution is even now being made, since it is clear to him both that men with the faculty in question are becoming more and more common and also that as a race we are approaching nearer and nearer to that stage of the self conscious mind from which the transition to the cosmic consciousness is effected. He knows that intelligent contact with cosmic conscious minds assists self-conscious individuals in the ascent to the higher plane.
The immediate future of our race [the writer thinks PDO] is indescribably hopeful. There are at the present moment impending over us three revolutions, the least of which would dwarf the ordinary historic upheaval called by that name into absolute insignificance. [But see Comment 1 on Dr Bucke's Book below PDO] They are: (1) the material, economic, and social revolution which will depend upon and result from the establishment of aerial navigation. (2) The economic and social revolution which will abolish individual ownership and rid the earth at once of two immense evils riches and poverty. (3) The psychical revolution of which there is here question.
Either of the first two would (and will) radically change the conditions of, and greatly uplift, human life; but the third will do more for humanity than both of the former were their importance multiplied by hundreds or even thousands.
The three operating (as they will) together will literally create a new heaven and a new earth. Old things will be done away and all will become new.
Before [i.e., because of. Ed.] aerial navigation national boundaries, tariffs, and perhaps distinctions of language will fade out. Great cities will no longer have reason for being and will melt away. The men who now dwell in cities will inhabit in summer the mountains and the seashores; building often in airy and beautiful spots, now almost or quite inaccessible, commanding the most extensive and magnificent views. In the winter they will probably dwell in communities of moderate size. As herding together, as now, in great cities, so the isolation of the worker of the soil will become a thing of the past. Space will be practically annihilated; there will be no crowding together and no enforced solitude.
Before socialism crushing toil, cruel anxiety, insulting and demoralising riches, poverty and its ills will become subjects for historical novels. [But see Comment 2 on Dr Bucke's Book below PDO]
Religion will govern every minute of every day of all life. Churches, priests, forms, creeds, prayers, and all intermediaries between the individual man and God will be permanently replaced by direct unmistakable intercourse. Sin will no longer exist nor will salvation be desired. Men will not worry about death or a future, or about the kingdom of heaven, or about what may come with and after the cessation of life in the present body. Each soul will feel and know itself to be immortal, and that the entire Universe with all its good and with all its beauty is for it to enjoy forever. The world peopled by men possessing cosmic consciousness will be as far removed from the world of today as this is from the world as it was before the advent of self consciousness.
There is a tradition, probably very old, to the effect that the first man was innocent and happy until he ate of the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil; that having eaten thereof he became aware that he was naked, and was ashamed. Further, that there sin was born into the world, the miserable sense whereof replaced man's former feeling of innocence; that then and not till then man began to labour and to cover his body. Stranger than all, the story runs, that along with this change or immediately following upon it, there came into man's mind the remarkable conviction which has never since left it, but which has been kept alive by its own inherent vitality and by the teaching of all true seers, prophets, and poets, that man will be saved by the rising up within him of a Saviour the Christ.
Man's progenitor was a creature with simple consciousness merely. He was (as are today the animals) incapable of sin and equally incapable of shame (at least in the human sense). He had no feeling or knowledge of good and evil. He as yet knew nothing of what we call work and had never laboured. From this state he fell (or rose) into self-consciousness, his eyes were opened, he knew he was naked, he felt shame, acquired the sense of sin (became in fact what is called a sinner) and learned to do certain things in order to encompass certain ends that is, he learned to labour.
For weary aeons this condition has lasted the sense of sin still haunts his pathway by the sweat of his brow he still eats bread he is still ashamed. Where is the deliverer, the Saviour? Who or what?
The Saviour of man is Cosmic Consciousness in Paul's language, the Christ. The cosmic sense (in whatever mind it appears) crushes the serpent's head destroys sin, shame, the sense of good and evil, as contrasted one with the other, and will annihilate labour, though not human activity.
At the age of thirty he fell in with Leaves of Grass, and at once saw that it contained, in greater measure than any book so far found, what he had so long been looking for. He read the Leaves eagerly, even passionately, but for several years derived little from them. At last light broke and there was revealed to him (as far perhaps as such things can be revealed) at least some of the meanings. Then occurred that to which the foregoing is the preface.
It was in early spring, at the beginning of his thirty-sixth year. He and two friends had spent the evening reading Wordsworth, Shelley, Keats, Browning, and especially Whitman. They parted at midnight, and he had a long drive in a hansom (it was in an English city). His mind, deeply under the influence of the ideas, images, and emotions called up by the reading and talk of the evening, was calm and peaceful. He was in a state of quiet, almost passive, enjoyment.
All at once, without warning of any kind, he found himself wrapped around, as it were, by a flame-coloured cloud. For an instant he thought of fire some sudden conflagration in the great city. The next (instant) he knew that the light was within himself.
Directly after there came upon him a sense of exultation, of immense joyousness, accompanied or immediately followed by an intellectual illumination quite impossible to describe. Into his brain streamed one momentary lightning-flash of the Brahmic Splendour which ever since lightened his life. Upon his heart fell one drop of the Brahmic Bliss, leaving thenceforward for always an after-taste of Heaven.
Among other things, he did not come to believe, he saw and knew that the cosmos is not dead matter but a living Presence, that the soul of man is immortal, that the Universe is so built and ordered that without peradventure all things work together for the good of each and all, that the foundation principle of the world is what we call love and that the happiness of everyone in the long run is absolutely certain. He claims he learned more within the few seconds during which the illumination lasted than in previous months or even years of study and that he learned much that no study could ever have taught.
The illumination itself continued not more than a few moments, but its effects proved ineffaceable; it was impossible for him ever to forget what he at that time saw and knew; neither did he, nor could he, ever doubt the truth of what was then presented to his mind. There was no return of the experience that night or at any other time.
The supreme occurrence of that night was his real and sole initiation to the new and higher order of ideas. But it was only an initiation. He saw the light but had no more idea whence it came and what it meant than had the first creature that saw the light of the Sun. Years afterwards he met a man who had had a large experience in the higher life. His conversations with this man threw a flood of light upon the meaning of what he had himself experienced.
Looking round then upon the world of man, he saw the significance of the subjective light in the case of Paul and in that of Mohammed. The secret of Whitman's transcendent greatness was revealed to him. Personal intercourse and conversations with men [among whom was Edward Carpenter PDO] who had similar experiences assisted greatly in broadening and clearing up his speculations.
After spending much time and labour in thinking, he came to the conclusion that there exists a family sprung from, living among, but scarcely forming a part of ordinary humanity, whose members are spread abroad throughout the advanced races of mankind and throughout the last forty centuries of the world's history.
The trait that distinguishes these people from other men is that their spiritual eyes have been opened and they have seen. The better known members of this group who, if they were collected together, could be accommodated all at one time in a modern drawing-room, have created all the great modern religions, beginning with Taoism and Buddhism, and speaking generally, have created, through religion and literature, modern civilisation. Not that they have contributed any large numerical proportion of the books which have been written, but that they have produced the few books which have inspired the larger number of all that have been written in modern times. These men dominate the last twenty-five, especially the last five, centuries as stars of the first magnitude dominate the midnight sky.
Although in the birth of Cosmic Consciousness the moral nature plays an important part, it will be better for many reasons to confine our attention at present to the evolution of the intellect. In this evolution there are four distinct steps. The first of them was taken when, upon the primary quality of excitability, sensation was established. At this point began the acquisition and more or less perfect registration of sense impressions that is, of percepts.
A percept is, of course, a sense impression: a sound is heard or an object seen and the impression made is a percept. If we could go back far enough we should find among our ancestors a creature whose whole intellect was made up simply of these percepts. But this creature, whatever name it ought to bear, had in it what may be called an eligibility to grow, and what happened with it was something like the following.
Individually, and from generation to generation, it accumulated these percepts whose constant repetition, calling for further and further registration, led in the struggle for existence and under the law of natural selection to an accumulation of cells in the central sense ganglia. The multiplication of cells made further registration possible, which in turn called for further growth of the ganglia, and so on. At last a condition was reached in which it became possible for our ancestor to combine groups of these percepts into what we today call a recept. This process is very similar to that of composite photography. Similar percepts (as of a tree) are registered one over the other until they are generalised into the recept of a tree.
Now the work of accumulation begins again on a higher plane. The sensory organs keep steadily at work manufacturing percepts; the receptual centres keep steadily manufacturing more and yet more recepts from the old and the new percepts. The capacities of the central ganglia are constantly taxed to do the necessary registration of recepts. Then, as the ganglia by use and selection are improved, they constantly manufacture from percepts and the initially simple recepts, more and more complex, i.e. higher and higher, recepts.
At last, after many thousands of generations have lived and died, comes a time when the mind of the animal we are considering has reached the highest possible point of purely receptual intelligence. The accumulation of precepts and recepts has gone on until no greater stores of impressions can be laid up and no further elaboration of these can be accomplished on the plane of receptual intelligence. Then another break is made and the higher recepts are replaced by concepts. The relation of a concept to a recept is somewhat similar to the relation of algebra to arithmetic. A recept is, as I have said, a composite image of hundreds, perhaps thousands, of percepts; it is itself an image abstracted from many images; but a concept is that same composite image that same recept named, ticketed, and, as it were, dismissed. A concept is neither more nor less than a named recept the name, i.e. the sign as in algebra, standing henceforth for the recept itself.
Now it is clear to any one who will give the least thought to the subject that the revolution by which concepts are substituted for recepts increases the efficiency of the brain for thought as much as the introduction of machinery increased the capacity of the race for work, or as much as the use of algebra increases the power of the mind in mathematical calculations. To replace a great cumbersome recept by a simple sign was almost like replacing actual goods such as wheat, fabrics, and hardware by entries in a ledger.
But, as hinted above, in order that a recept may be replaced by a concept, it must be named. This implies that the race that is in possession of concepts must also possess a language. It should also be noted that the possession of both concepts and language (which are in reality two aspects of the same thing) implies the possession of self-consciousness. All this means that there is a moment in the evolution of mind when the receptual intellect, capable only of simple consciousness, becomes virtually instantaneously a conceptual intellect in possession of language and self consciousness.
Our intellect, then, today is made up of a very complex mixture of percepts, recepts, and concepts.
The next chapter in the story is the accumulation of concepts. This is a double process: each individual accumulates a larger and larger number while the individual concepts are constantly becoming more and more complex.
Is there to be any limit to this growth of concepts in number and complexity? Whoever will seriously consider that question will see that there must be a limit. No such process could go on to infinity.
We have seen that the expansion of the perceptual mind had a necessary limit: that its continued life led inevitably up to and into the receptual mind; that the receptual mind by its own growth was inevitably led up to and into the conceptual mind. A priori considerations make it certain that a corresponding outlet will be found for the conceptual mind.
But we do not need to depend upon abstract reasoning to demonstrate the necessary existence of the supra-conceptual mind, since it exists and can be studied with no more difficulty than other natural phenomena. The supra-conceptual intellect, the elements of which instead of being concepts are intuitions, is already (in small numbers it is true) an established fact, and the form of consciousness that belongs to that intellect may be, and has been, called Cosmic Consciousness.
The basic fact in cosmic consciousness is implied in its name that fact is consciousness of the cosmos. This is what in the East is called "Brahmic Splendour", which is in Dante's phrase capable of transhumanising a man into a god. Whitman, who has an immense deal to say about it, speaks of it in one place as "ineffable light light rare, untellable, lighting the very light beyond all signs, descriptions, languages". This consciousness shows the cosmos to consist not of dead matter governed by unconscious, rigid, and unintending law; it shows it on the contrary as entirely immaterial, entirely spiritual, and entirely alive; it shows that death is an absurdity, that everyone and everything has eternal life; it shows that the Universe is God and that God is the Universe....
A great deal of this is of course absurd from the point of view of self-consciousness; it is nevertheless absolutely true. Now all this does not mean that when a man has cosmic consciousness he knows everything about the Universe. We all know that when at three years of age we acquired self-consciousness, we did not at once know all about ourselves.... So neither does a man know all about the cosmos merely because he becomes conscious of it....
If it has taken the race several thousand years to learn a smattering of the science of humanity since its acquisition of self-consciousness, so it may take it millions of years to acquire cosmic consciousness.
As on self-consciousness is based the human world as we see it with all its works and ways, so on cosmic consciousness is based the higher religions and the higher philosophies and what comes from them, and on it will be based, when it becomes more general, a new world of which it would be idle to try to speak today.
The philosophy of the birth of cosmic consciousness in the individual is very similar to that of the birth of self-consciousness. The mind becomes overcrowded, as it were, with concepts and these are constantly becoming larger, more numerous, and more and more complex; some day (the conditions being all favourable) the fusion, or what might be called the chemical union, of several of them and of certain moral elements takes place; the result is an intuition and the establishment of the intuitional mind, or, in other words, cosmic consciousness. [But see Comment 3 on Dr Bucke's Book below PDO]
The scheme by which the mind is built up is uniform from beginning to end: a recept is made of many percepts; a concept of many or several recepts and percepts; and an intuition is made of many concepts, recepts, and percepts together with other elements belonging to and drawn from the moral nature. The cosmic vision or the cosmic intuition, from which what may be called the new mind takes its name, is thus seen to be simply the complex and union of all prior thought and experience just as self-consciousness is the complex and union of all thought and experience prior to it.
Cosmic consciousness, like other forms of consciousness, is capable of growth and may have different forms, different degrees.
It must not be supposed that because a man has cosmic consciousness he is therefore omniscient or infallible. Men of cosmic consciousness have reached a higher level; but on that level there can be different degrees of consciousness. And it must be still more evident that, however godlike the faculty may be, those who first acquire it, living in diverse ages and countries, passing their lives in different surroundings, brought up to view life from totally different points of view, must necessarily interpret somewhat differently those things which they see in the new world which they enter.
Language is the exact tally of the intellect; for every concept there is a word or words and for every word there is concept.... No word can come into being except as the expression of a concept, neither can a new concept be formed without the formation (at the same time) of the new word which is its expression. But as a matter of fact ninety-nine out of every hundred of our sense impressions and emotions have never been represented in the intellect by concepts and therefore remain unexpressed and inexpressible except by roundabout description and suggestion.
As the correspondence of words and concepts is not casual or temporary but resides in the nature of these and continues during all time and under all circumstances absolutely constant, so changes in one of the factors must correspond with changes in the other. So evolution of intellect must be accompanied by evolution of language. An evolution of language will be evidence of evolution of intellect.
Upon experiencing the new sense, the first thing each person asks himself is whether what he sees and feels represents reality or whether he is suffering from a delusion. The fact that the new experience seems even more real than the old teachings of consciousness does not at first fully reassure him, because he knows the force of delusions.
Simultaneously or instantly following the above sense and emotional experiences, there come to the person an intellectual illumination quite impossible to describe. Like a flash there is presented to his consciousness a clear conception (a vision) in outline of the meaning and drift of the Universe. He does not come merely to believe; but he sees and knows that the cosmos, which to the self-conscious mind seems made up of dead matter, is in fact far otherwise is in very truth a living presence. He sees that instead of men being, as it were, patches of life scattered through an infinite sea of non-living substance, they are in reality specks of relative death in an infinite ocean of life. He sees that the life which is in man is eternal, as all life is eternal; that the soul of man is as immortal as God is....
A man learns infinitely more of the new. Especially does he obtain such a conception of THE WHOLE or at least of an immense WHOLE as dwarfs all conception, imagination, or speculation such a conception as makes the old attempts to mentally grasp the Universe and its meaning petty and even ridiculous.
The expansion of the intellect enormously increases the capacity both for learning and initiating.
Such is the faculty of speech (i.e., the faculty of making concepts). Probably in a distant past, at the beginning of the appearance of self-consciousness, this faculty was the gift of a few exceptional individuals and it began then to appear perhaps in senility. After that it began to appear more frequently and to manifest itself earlier. Probably there was a period when speech was not a gift of all men just as are not now artistic talents, the musical sense, the sense of colour and form. Gradually it became possible for all, and then inevitable and necessary if some physical defect did not prevent its manifestation.
Moreover Dr Bucke makes an entirely arbitrary conclusion concerning the inevitability of the further evolution of man, because unconscious evolution (i.e., unconscious for the individual directed by the consciousness of the species) in the vegetable and animal kingdoms is impossible with the appearance of reasoning in man. It is necessary to recognise that the mind of a man depends upon itself to a considerably greater degree than the mind of an animal. The mind of a man has far more power over itself; it can assist its own evolution, and can also impede it. We are confronted with the general question: can unconscious evolution proceed with the appearance of reasoning? It is far more correct to suppose that the appearance of reasoning annihilates the possibility of unconscious evolution. Power over evolution passes from the group-soul (or from Nature) to the individual itself. Further evolution, if it take place, cannot be an elemental and unconscious affair, but will result solely from conscious efforts toward growth. [See quotations from Mabel Collins' books. PDO]
This is the most interesting point in the whole process, but Dr Bucke fails to bring it out. Man, not striving toward evolution, not conscious of its possibility, not helping it, will not evolve. And the individual who is not evolving does not remain in a static condition but goes down, degenerates (i.e., some of his elements begin their own evolution, inimical to the whole). [See, e.g., Degeneration in Prof. Drummond's book, Natural Law in the Spiritual World. Ed.]. This is the general law. And if we take into consideration what an infinitesimal percentage of men think and are capable of thinking of their evolution (or their striving toward higher things), then we shall see that to talk about the inevitability of this evolution is at least naοve.
But Dr Bucke regards this new faculty of understanding and reasoning as a product of the evolution of existing faculties and this vitiates all his deductions. Let us imagine that some scientist from another planet, not suspecting the existence of man, studies the horse, and its "evolution" from colt to saddle-horse, and regards as its highest evolution the horse with the horseman in the saddle. From our point of view it is clearly impossible to regard a man sitting in the horse's saddle as a fact of horse evolution, but from the point of view of the scientist who knows nothing about man, this will be only logical.
Dr Bucke finds himself in exactly this position when he regards that which transcends the region of humanity altogether as a fact of human evolution. Man possessing cosmic consciousness, or approaching cosmic consciousness, is not merely man but man with something higher added. Dr Bucke, like Edward Carpenter in many cases also, is handicapped by the desire not to go too strongly counter to accepted views (although that is inevitable); by the desire to reconcile these views with the "new thought", to flatten out contradictions, to reduce everything to one thing, which is of course impossible as is the reconciliation of correct and incorrect, true and false views upon one and the same thing.
The founders of world-religions, prophets, philosophers, poets these are men of "cosmic consciousness" according to Dr Bucke's book. He does not pretend to present a full list of them, and it is of course possible to add many names to his list. [Dr Bucke makes a very important error concerning self-consciousness. In his opinion, "simple consciousness" characterises and animal and "self-consciousness" characterises a man. But as a matter of fact a prolonged self-consciousness during sensation, feeling, or thinking is a very rare phenomenon in man. Usually, that which is called "self-conscious" is simply thought and it goes post factum. True self-consciousness exists in man only potentially and, if it manifests, it does so only by moments. These moments of self-consciousness should not be identified with prolonged self-consciousness. Prolonged self-consciousness is already "a new consciousness", and there is the possibility of moments of cosmic consciousness which, in the course of further development, may in turn become prolonged. PDO.]
But, after all, various little imperfections of Dr Bucke's book are not important, nor are additions which might possibly be made. What is important is the general conclusion to which Dr Bucke comes the possibility and the immanence of the NEW Consciousness.
All this announces to us the nearness of the NEW HUMANITY. We are building without taking into consideration the fact that a NEW MASTER must come who may not at all like everything that we have built. Our "social sciences", sociology, and so forth, have in view only man, while as I have several times shown before, the concept "man" is a complex one, and includes in itself different categories of men going along different paths. The future belongs not to man, but to superman, who is already born and lives among us.
A higher race is rapidly emerging among humanity, and it is emerging by reason of its quite remarkable understanding of the world and life.
It will be truly a HIGHER RACE and there will be no possibility of any falsification, any substitution, or any usurpation at all. It will be impossible for anything to be bought, or appropriated to oneself, by deceit or by might. Not only will this race be, but it already is.
The men approaching transition into a new race begin already to know one another: already are established passwords and countersigns. And perhaps those social and political questions so sharply put forward in our time may be solved on quite another plane and by quite a different method than we think may be solved by the entrance into the arena of a new race CONSCIOUS OF ITSELF which will judge the old races.
We may say further with regard to Dr Bucke's entire book that touching the idea of the natural growth of consciousness, he does not notice that these faculties do not unfold themselves perforce: conscious work on them is necessary. And he does not dwell at all on conscious efforts in this direction, on the idea of the culture of cosmic consciousness.
Meanwhile there exists a whole series of psychological teachings (occultism, yoga, etc.) and a large literature having in view a systematic culture of the higher consciousness. Dr Bucke does not remark this, and insists upon the idea of natural growth, although he himself several times touches upon the culture of consciousness. In one portion of his book he speaks very contemptuously regarding the use of narcotics for the creation of ecstatic states, not taking into consideration the fact that narcotics cannot give anything which man does not possess (this is the explanation of the different action of narcotics in different men), but can only in certain cases unfold that which is already in the soul of man. This entirely alters the point of view upon narcotics, as Prof. William James has shown in his book, The Varieties of Religious Experience.
In general, allured by the evolutionary point of view, and looking at the future, Dr Bucke, like many others, does not pay sufficient attention to the present. That new consciousness which men may discover or unfold in themselves now is indeed far more important than that which may or may not appear in other men millennia hence.
| Table of the Four Forms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Forms of Consciousness | Living World | Man of Higher Type |
| Latent Consciousness, similar to our instincts and unconscious feelings. | Cells, groups of cells, lower animals, and organs and parts of body of higher animals and of man. | Cells, groups of cells, tissues and organs of the body |
| Simple Consciousness and flashes of thought. | Animals possessing complex organisms. Absence of consciousness of death. | Body, instincts, desires, voices of the body, emotions. |
| Reasoning. Moments of self-consciousness and flashes of cosmic consciousness. | Man. Consciousness of death or fantastic theories of immortality. | Simple emotions, logical reason, mind. |
| Self-consciousness and beginning of cosmic consciousness | Man of higher type. Beginning of immortality. | Higher emotions, higher intellect, intuition, mystical wisdom. |
The simultaneous coexistence of all four forms of consciousness at once, both in Nature and in the higher type of man, makes the exclusively evolutionary point of view seem forced and artificial. The evolutionary standpoint is often made the means of escape from difficult problems and from hard thinking.
Some people apply the evolutionary theory where there is no necessity for it whatever. In many cases this is a compromise of thought. Not understanding the existing variety of forms, and not possessing the skill to think of all this as a unity, men have recourse to the evolutionary idea, and regard this great variety of forms as an ascending ladder not because this conforms to facts, but from a desire to systematise the observed facts at all costs, though on entirely artificial foundations. It appears to men that, having built a system, they already know something, whereas in reality the absence of a system is often much nearer to real knowledge than an artificial system.
"Evolutionists", being incapable of understanding the whole without representing it to themselves as a chain, one link of which is connected with another, are like the blind men in the Oriental fable who feel an elephant in different places, and one affirms that the elephant is like pillars, another that it is like thick rope, and so on. The evolutionists, however, add to this that the trunk of the elephant must evolve from the feet, the ears from the trunk, and so on.
But we after all know that this is an elephant, i.e., a single being, unknown to men who are blind. Such a being is the living world. And with regard to the forms of consciousness, it is far more correct to consider them not as consecutive phases or steps of evolution which are separate from one another, but as different sides or parts of one whole which we do not know.
In "man" this unity is apparent. All forms of consciousness in him can exist simultaneously; the life of cells and organs, with their consciousness; the life of the entire body, taken as a whole; the life of the emotions and of the logical reason; and the life of the higher understanding and feeling.
The higher form of consciousness is not necessary for life; it is possible to live without it. But without it the organisation and orderliness of life is impossible. Long under the domination of materialism and positive thinking, forgetting and perverting religious ideas, men thought that it was possible to live by the merely logical mind alone. But now, little by little, it is becoming quite evident to those who have eyes that merely by the exercise of logical reason men will not be able to organise their life on earth, and if they do not finally exterminate themselves, as some tribes and peoples are doing, they will in any case create (and have already created) impossible conditions of life in which everything gained will be lost i.e., everything that was given them in the past by men of self-consciousness and cosmic consciousness.
I do not deny the law of evolution, but the application of it to the explanation of many phenomena of life is in great need of correction.
Firstly if we accept the idea of one common evolution, after all it is necessary to remember that the types which develop slower, the remnants of evolution, may not continue to follow after, and at a slow pace, the same evolution, but may begin an evolution of their own, developing in many cases exactly those properties on account of which they were ejected from basic evolution.
Secondly, though we accept the law of evolution, there is no necessity to regard all existing forms as having been developed one from another (like man from the ape, for example). In such cases it is more correct to regard them all as the highest types in their own evolution. The absence of intermediate forms makes this view very much more probable than that which is usually accepted, and which gives such rich material for discussions about the obligatory and inevitable perfection of all "perfection" from our standpoint.
The views propounded here are indeed more difficult that the usual evolutionary point of view, just as the conception of the living world as an entire organism is more difficult; but this difficulty must be surmounted. I have said already that the real world must be illogical from the usual points of view, and by no means can it be made simple and comprehensible to one and all. The theory of evolution is in need of many corrections, additions, and much development. If we consider the existing forms on any given plane, it will be quite impossible to declare that all these forms evolved from the simplest forms on this plane. Some undoubtedly evolved from the lowest ones; others resulted from the process of degeneration of the higher ones; a third class developed from the remnants of some evolved form; while a fourth class resulted as a consequence of the incursion into the given plane of the properties and characteristics of some higher plane.
The following classification will show more clearly this correlation of forms of manifestation of consciousness, or of different states of consciousness.
First Form. A sense of one-dimensional space in relation to the outer world. Everything transpires on a line, as it were. Sensations are not differentiated. Consciousness is immersed in itself, in its work of nutrition, digestion and assimilation of food, etc. This is the state of the cell, the group of cells, of tissues and organs of the body of an animal, of plants, and of lower organisms. In man, this is the "instinctive mind".
Second Form. A sense of two-dimensional space. This is the state of the animal. That which for us is the third dimension for it is motion. It already senses, feels, but does not think. Every thing that it sees appears to it as genuinely real. Emotional life and flashes of thought in a man.
Third Form. A sense of three-dimensional space. Logical thinking. Philosophical division into I and Not-I. Dogmatic religions or dualistic spiritism. Codified morality. Division into spirit and matter. Positivistic science. The idea of evolution. A mechanical universe. The understanding of cosmic ideas as metaphors. Imperialism, "historical materialism", socialism, etc. Subjection of the personality to society and law. Automatism. Death as the extinction of the personality. Intellect and flashes of self-consciousness.
Fourth form. Beginning of the understanding of four-dimensional space. A new concept of time. The possibility of more prolonged self-consciousness. Flashes of cosmic consciousness. The idea and sometimes the sensation of a living Universe. A striving towards the wondrous. Sensation of infinity. Beginning of self-conscious will and moments of cosmic consciousness. Possibility of personal immortality.
Thus the third form includes that "man" whom science studies. But the fourth form is characteristic of the man who is beginning to pass out of the field of observation of positivism and logical understanding.
The table at the end of the book is a summing up of the contents of the entire book, and shows in more detail the correlation of the observed forms of consciousness in the living world and in "man".